Why Russia Still Needs the Atlantic Access

By Adelio Debenedetti — an exploration of Grey Zones, where power operates beyond formal maps, official archives, and declared conflict.

Arctic sea routes illustrate Russia’s northern access constraints: operationally promising, yet seasonal, demanding, and strategically insufficient on their own.

Source / Credit Arctic Portal – The Arctic Gateway

Methodological Premise

This article does not address short-term crises or tactical incidents. It examines a structural necessity: why Russia—first Soviet, now post-Soviet—has consistently sought access to the North Atlantic, and why that need persists today.

Within the Grey Zones Manifesto, Russia is not treated as an ideological antagonist but as a geographically constrained power. Geography, more than politics, explains its Atlantic ambition.

1) Russia’s permanent geographic constraint

Russia is a continental power with restricted maritime exits:

• The Baltic is enclosed and easily monitored.

• The Black Sea is conditioned by the Turkish Straits.

• The Arctic is seasonal, demanding, and operationally complex.

• The Pacific is distant from Russia’s political and economic core.

For a state seeking global relevance, these constraints are limiting.The Atlantic represents something different: depth, distance, and freedom of maneuver.

The Black Sea illustrates constrained maritime access: Russia’s naval presence is conditioned by the Turkish Straits and external gatekeepers.

Source / Credit Wikimedia Commons – Black Sea map

2) The Atlantic as strategic oxygen

The Atlantic is not merely an oceanic space. It is:

• the connective tissue between North America and Europe;

• the backbone of Western logistics and deterrence;

• the arena where submarines can operate with stealth and persistence.

For Russia, Atlantic access means the ability to:

• bypass regional containment;

• challenge Western cohesion at its center of gravity;

• transform maritime power into strategic leverage.

Access, however, is not open. It is mediated by a gate.

North Atlantic Tracks visualize the Atlantic as a managed transit system, where movement, coordination, and monitoring replace open maneuver.

 Source / Credit Flight Service Bureau / ICAO North Atlantic Tracks

3) The GIUK Gap: The invisible barrier

The GIUK Gap—Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom—functions as the primary barrier between Russian naval forces and the open Atlantic.

Control of this corridor allows:

• early detection of submarine movements;

• regulation of transatlantic access;

• persistent pressure without overt confrontation.

For NATO, the GIUK Gap is a containment mechanism.For Russia, it is the obstacle that must be tested.

4) Continuity from the Cold War to the Present

After 1945, Soviet strategy did not aim to “conquer” the Atlantic. It aimed to complicate it.

• The Northern Fleet gained primacy.

• Submarines became the central instrument.

• The objective shifted from dominance to uncertainty.

Crossing the GIUK Gap was less important than proving it could be crossed.Deterrence was achieved by ambiguity, not occupation.

That logic persists today.

5) Krigan as a function, not a Base

Within the Manifesto, Krigan is not a certified facility. It is a functional placeholder for a recurring requirement near the Atlantic gate: depth, logistics, concealment, and optionality.

Russia does not need a named Krigan. It needs the gate to be porous—to allow:

• transient access;

• operational windows;

• zones of ambiguity.

Krigan represents that requirement independent of nationality or era.

6) From Naval Competition to Grey-Zone Pressure

In the post–Cold War period, Russia did not abandon the Atlantic objective. It recalibrated it.

• Less direct confrontation.

• More signaling and testing.

• Persistent undersea activity below the threshold of conflict.

Exercises, patrols, and deployments near the GIUK Gap serve a clear purpose:to remind adversaries that the Atlantic can be contested, even without escalation.

Cold War missile submarine patrol areas reveal how strategic pressure was exercised through persistent presence rather than territorial control.

Source / Credit The Map Archive – Cold War Naval Maps

7) Forcing the Gate without passing through

The key insight is this: Russia does not need permanent Atlantic presence. It needs NATO to defend against the possibility of that presence.

Every attempt to probe the GIUK Gap:

• ties down Western assets;

• raises readiness costs;

• reinforces the strategic importance of the corridor.

This is pressure by implication, not invasion.

A need that does mot expire

This article does not argue that Russia is about to dominate the Atlantic. It argues something more durable: Russia cannot afford to stop seeking access to it.

Because:

• geography constrains it;

• the Atlantic enables it;

• the GIUK Gap blocks it.

This triangle has shaped Russian strategy for decades—and continues to do so.

In the Grey Zones Manifesto, the lesson is clear:conflicts endure not because ideologies persist,but because geographic necessities do.

Russia Atlantic Access

And as long as the Atlantic remains the world’s strategic ocean,Russia will continue to need a way in. This continuity—hidden, technical, and rarely documented—is the foundation of the Grey Zones Manifesto, an analytical framework for understanding how power operates through infrastructure, logistics, and strategic necessity

#Greyzonemanifesto